Global Corporate Survey 2026: CISO Priorities, Pressures And Preparedness

Report
Navigator
Bill Pennington

Bill Pennington

13 May, 2026

Access this research

Access all Corporate Risk Leaders content with a strategic subscription or buy this single report

Need help or have a question about this report? Contact us for assistance

Executive Summary

This report helps IT risk and cybersecurity leaders benchmark their firms' priorities, pressures and preparedness strategies relative to their global peer group. The data also support strategic decision-making and resilience planning for executives at cybersecurity consulting and technology firms. The 2026 Verdantix chief information security officer (CISO) global corporate survey spans 25 countries and 10 industries, with respondents comprising 102 senior cybersecurity and IT risk leaders. Insights reveal that cybersecurity strategies are under mounting pressure to become more adaptive and recovery-focused, as AI-powered threats and expanding third-party networks render traditional technical playbooks increasingly inadequate. This is driving a greater emphasis on enterprise-wide resilience; with vulnerability points multiplying and sensitive data becoming harder to protect, the CISO mandate is shifting from technical defence to strategic risk leadership at the board level.

Summary for decision-makers
Survey reveals cybersecurity priorities, pressures and preparedness of CISOs and IT risk leaders in 2026
Data feature the perspectives of 102 executives globally, covering a diverse range of industries
CISOs are under pressure to evolve from technical gatekeepers to strategic resilience enablers
Cyber threats are no longer confined to the IT department – their reach across the entire enterprise is exposing a critical skills deficit
Resilience-first ambitions are growing, but regulatory compliance remains the primary driver of cybersecurity spend
Third-party networks and AI are expanding the risk perimeter beyond the borders of traditional cybersecurity frameworks
Third parties remain the weakest link in cyber security, multiplying the vulnerability points through which data can be compromised
More sophisticated AI is breaking out of the cybersecurity function to become its own category of risk
Governance choices around threat assessment and leadership involvement are determining cyber preparedness
Firms are taking a divided approach to assessing third-party vulnerabilities, as investment in threat intelligence plateaus
Cyber risk ownership must be clearly defined – too much CEO involvement may be counterproductive

Figure 1. Survey respondents: geographical breakdown
Figure 2.
Survey respondents: industry breakdown
Figure 3.
Most urgent challenges to meeting cybersecurity goals
Figure 4.
How cybersecurity priorities are set in an organization
Figure 5.
Factors increasing spend on cyber security
Figure 6.
Cybersecurity budget changes 2025-26
Figure 7.
Most material cybersecurity risks
Figure 8.
Most significant cybersecurity threats over the next 12 months
Figure 9.
Views on the impact of AI on cyber security
Figure 10.
New technology, attack surfaces and cybersecurity spend
Figure 11.
How third-party vulnerability assessments are prioritized
Figure 12.
Use of threat intelligence tools to assess cybersecurity exposures
Figure 13.
CEO involvement in the cybersecurity function
Figure 14.
Confidence in handling a major cyber incident without external escalation

About the Authors

Mahum Khawar

Mahum Khawar

Analyst

Mahum is an Analyst at Verdantix, specializing in AI integrations within risk management software and operational resilience. She advises technology buyers and software vendor...

View Profile
Bill Pennington

Bill Pennington

VP Research

Bill is VP Research at Verdantix, where he leads analysis on the evolving and interconnected landscapes of EHS, quality, AI and enterprise risk management. His research helps ...

Other related content

Webinar
Third-Party Risk Management
Enterprise Risk & GRC
Corporate Risk Leaders
Decoding Risk Intelligence: What The Fi...

Risk leaders are being asked to monitor a widening range of external threats, many of which overlap in ways that make them difficult to track in isolation. Cybersecurity remains fr...

Upcoming / 04 November, 2026

Blog
Corporate Risk Leaders
Third-Party Risk Management
AI Platforms & Applications
Singapore Raises The Bar For AI Risk Ma...

In December 2025, Verdantix examined Singapore’s proposed approach to AI risk management in financial services following the Monetary Authority of Singapore's (MAS) launch of a ...

30 September, 2026

Blog
Corporate Risk Leaders
The US’s Hallucinated Nuclear Threat Sh...

In late September 2026, it came to light that a US intelligence report detailing the movements of Chinese naval vessels in the Middle East in spring 2026 identified nuclear-grade...

25 September, 2026

Blog
Corporate Risk Leaders
MCP Servers Are Closing The AI Context ...

2026 has brought a new trend to the governance, risk and compliance (GRC) software market. In April, Optro launched Model Context Protocol (MCP) server capabilities, and SureCloud ...

24 September, 2026

Blog
Corporate Risk Leaders
If AI Can Outsmart Its Creators, Can Fi...

In September 2026, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei warned that AI’s capabilities were developing too quickly and becoming reckless. This view was quickly backed by OpenAI’s Sam Altm...

22 September, 2026

Blog
Corporate Risk Leaders
Hungary's Dehydrated Nuclear Plant Is A...

In August 2026, while the longstanding blockade of the Strait of Hormuz was sending energy prices soaring across the world, Hungary faced a quieter crisis of its own: the Paks nu...

16 September, 2026